Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Percentile response time anomalies at 100% #254

Closed
mblakele opened this issue Mar 15, 2015 · 1 comment
Closed

Percentile response time anomalies at 100% #254

mblakele opened this issue Mar 15, 2015 · 1 comment
Labels

Comments

@mblakele
Copy link

With locust 0.7.2 there seems to be a calculation problem with the 100% column. It's often reported a few ms lower than the preceding columns, which should be impossible. In the example below it's especially glaring when there was only one request for a particular endpoint: 99%: 580; 100%: 575. But I see a similar anomaly in the last line, which has 53 requests. In my data the anomalies seem to be common with less that 100 requests, but rare or at least invisible after that.

Percentage of the requests completed within given times
 Name                                                           # reqs    50%    66%    75%    80%    90%    95%    98%    99%   100%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 GET /                                                            5346     70     81     89     96    120    130    160    170    282
 GET /rankings/networks/search/1063/                                 1    660    660    660    660    660    660    660    660    661
 GET /rankings/networks/search/1067/                                 1    630    630    630    630    630    630    630    630    625
 GET /rankings/networks/search/1068/                                 1    580    580    580    580    580    580    580    580    575
 GET /terms_of_service/?next=/                                      53    430    580    760    830    890    940    960   1000    996
@heyman heyman added the bug label Mar 16, 2015
@cyberw
Copy link
Collaborator

cyberw commented Oct 18, 2019

I think (hope) this has been solved. Let me know if this is not the case.

@cyberw cyberw closed this as completed Oct 18, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants