🐛 Create a better template for questionnaires (#1583)

- Add a more relevant template questionnaire demonstrating all of the
assessment capabilities

Signed-off-by: ibolton336 <ibolton@redhat.com>

client/public/templates/questionnaire-template.yaml

@@ -1,103 +1,86 @@
-name: Test questionnaire  (SAMPLE)
-description: This is a sample questionnaire in YAML format
+name: Uploadable Cloud Readiness Questionnaire Template
+description: This questionnaire is an example template for assessing cloud readiness. It serves as a guide for users to create and customize their own questionnaire templates.
 required: true
 sections:
   - order: 1
-    name: Section 1
+    name: Application Technologies
     questions:
       - order: 1
-        text: What is your favorite color?
-        explanation: Please select your favorite color.
-        includeFor:
-          - category: Category1
-            tag: Tag1
-        excludeFor: []
+        text: What is the main technology in your application?
+        explanation: Identify the main framework or technology used in your application.
         answers:
           - order: 1
-            text: Red
-            risk: red
-            rationale: Red is a nice color.
+            text: Quarkus
+            risk: green
+            rationale: Quarkus is a modern, container-friendly framework.
             mitigation: No mitigation needed.
-            applyTags: []
-            autoAnswerFor: [{ category: Category1, tag: Tag1 }]
-            selected: false
+            applyTags:
+              - category: Technology
+                tag: Quarkus
           - order: 2
-            text: Blue
+            text: Spring Boot
             risk: green
-            rationale: Blue is a calming color.
-            mitigation: No mitigation needed.
-            applyTags: []
-            autoAnswerFor: []
-            selected: false
+            rationale: Spring Boot is versatile and widely used.
+            mitigation: Ensure container compatibility.
+            applyTags:
+              - category: Technology
+                tag: Spring Boot
+          - order: 3
+            text: Legacy Monolithic Application
+            risk: red
+            rationale: Legacy monoliths are challenging for cloud adaptation.
+            mitigation: Consider refactoring into microservices.
+            applyTags:
+              - category: Architecture
+                tag: Monolith
       - order: 2
-        text: What is your favorite sport?
-        explanation: Please select your favorite sport.
-        excludeFor:
-          - category: Category1
-            tag: Tag1
+        text: Does your application use a microservices architecture?
+        explanation: Assess if the application is built using a microservices architecture.
         answers:
           - order: 1
-            text: Soccer
-            risk: red
-            rationale: There are other sports?
-            mitigation: Beware of crunching tackles. High risk of injury.
-            applyTags: []
-            autoAnswerFor: []
-            selected: false
+            text: Yes
+            risk: green
+            rationale: Microservices are well-suited for cloud environments.
+            mitigation: Continue monitoring service dependencies.
+            applyTags:
+              - category: Architecture
+                tag: Microservices
           - order: 2
-            text: Cycling
-            risk: red
-            rationale: Correct.
-            mitigation: High risk of decapitation by car.
-            applyTags: []
-            autoAnswerFor: []
-            selected: false
-          - order: 3
-            text: Climbing
+            text: No
             risk: yellow
-            rationale: Climbing is fun.
-            mitigation: Slight bit of mitigation needed.
-            applyTags: []
-            autoAnswerFor: []
-            selected: false
-          - order: 4
-            text: Swimming
-            risk: yellow
-            rationale: Swimming is fun, too.
-            mitigation: Slight bit of mitigation needed. Drowning can be a problem.
-            applyTags: []
-            autoAnswerFor: []
-            selected: false
-          - order: 5
-            text: Running
-            risk: red
-            rationale: Oof.
-            mitigation: Some mitigation required. High risk of injury. Don't run with scissors (or at all).
-            applyTags: []
-            autoAnswerFor: []
-            selected: false
+            rationale: Non-microservices architectures may face scalability issues.
+            mitigation: Assess the feasibility of transitioning to microservices.
+          - order: 3
+            text: Unknown
+            risk: unknown
+            rationale: Lack of clarity on architecture can lead to unplanned issues.
+            mitigation: Conduct an architectural review.
+
       - order: 3
-        text: What is your favorite shape?
-        explanation: Please select your favorite shape.
-        includeFor:
-          - category: Category1
-            tag: Tag1
-        excludeFor: []
+        text: Is your application's data storage cloud-optimized?
+        explanation: Evaluate if the data storage solution is optimized for cloud usage.
         answers:
           - order: 1
-            text: Circle
-            risk: red
-            selected: false
-          - order: 2
-            text: Square
+            text: Cloud-Native Storage Solution
             risk: green
-            selected: false
+            rationale: Cloud-native solutions offer scalability and resilience.
+            mitigation: Ensure regular backups and disaster recovery plans.
+          - order: 2
+            text: Traditional On-Premises Storage
+            risk: red
+            rationale: Traditional storage might not scale well in the cloud.
+            mitigation: Explore cloud-based storage solutions.
+          - order: 3
+            text: Hybrid Storage Approach
+            risk: yellow
+            rationale: Hybrid solutions may have integration complexities.
+            mitigation: Evaluate and optimize cloud integration points.
 thresholds:
-  red: 5
-  yellow: 10
+  red: 1
+  yellow: 30
   unknown: 15
 riskMessages:
-  red: High risk
-  yellow: Medium risk
-  green: Low risk
-  unknown: Unknown risk
+  red: Requires deep changes in architecture or lifecycle
+  yellow: Cloud friendly but needs minor changes
+  green: Cloud Native
+  unknown: More information needed