⚠️ Archetypes and Custom Assessments #476
Conversation
mansam
force-pushed
the
custom-assessments
branch
from
3e0153c
to
148f3a0
Compare
api/questionnaire.go
Outdated
| ApplyTags []CategorizedTag `json:"applyTags,omitempty" yaml:"applyTags,omitempty"` | ||
| AutoAnswerFor []CategorizedTag `json:"autoAnswerFor,omitempty" yaml:"autoAnswerFor,omitempty"` | ||
| Selected bool `json:"selected,omitempty" yaml:"selected,omitempty"` | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@mansam Is there going to be an answers array on the question struct?
api/assessment.go
Outdated
| Questionnaire Ref `json:"questionnaire" yaml:"questionnaire"` | ||
| Sections []Section `json:"sections" yaml:"sections"` | ||
| Thresholds Thresholds `json:"thresholds" yaml:"thresholds"` | ||
| RiskMessages RiskMessages `json:"riskMessages" yaml:"riskMessages"` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Wondering how we might determine assessment status?
migration/v9/model/assessment.go
Outdated
| Revision uint | ||
| Sections JSON | ||
| Thresholds JSON | ||
| RiskMessages JSON |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Do we need to add the Stakeholder & StakeholderGroup at the assessment level here since we can associate them to assessments within the wizard?
mansam
force-pushed
the
custom-assessments
branch
from
fa7417c
to
75172b5
Compare
api/application.go
Outdated
| @@ -856,10 +1054,13 @@ type Application struct { | |||
| Comments string `json:"comments"` | |||
| Identities []Ref `json:"identities"` | |||
| Tags []TagRef `json:"tags"` | |||
| BusinessService *Ref `json:"businessService"` | |||
| BusinessService *Ref `json:"businessService" yaml:"businessService"` | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
why is the yaml tag needed. IIRC, it would default to the same camel cased.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm not sure what lead to that happening. Fixing.
| // Binding is strict: unknown fields in the input will cause binding to fail. | ||
| func (h *BaseHandler) BindJSON(ctx *gin.Context, r interface{}) (err error) { | ||
| if ctx.Request == nil || ctx.Request.Body == nil { | ||
| err = errors.New("invalid request") |
| // Binding is strict: unknown fields in the input will cause binding to fail. | ||
| func (h *BaseHandler) BindYAML(ctx *gin.Context, r interface{}) (err error) { | ||
| if ctx.Request == nil || ctx.Request.Body == nil { | ||
| err = errors.New("invalid request") |
| - key: A | ||
| value: 1 | ||
| - key: B | ||
| value: 2 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The Application resource doesn't have a facts field, so these were just getting ignored. This PR turns on strict binding, so the unknown field causes a failure.
|
Seems there are yaml tags where they are not needed. |
|
Ensure the new scopes have been added to auth/roles. |
mansam
force-pushed
the
custom-assessments
branch
from
6e7290a
to
f1754dd
Compare
Signed-off-by: Sam Lucidi <slucidi@redhat.com>
mansam
force-pushed
the
custom-assessments
branch
from
5a6beca
to
dcfd9b2
Compare
No description provided.