-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 822
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add rendering for playground=structure #3885
Comments
Actually playground=structure does not mean a particular type of playground, it is one of the typical playground devices. Among them are swings, see-saws, sandpits etc. None of this playground equipment is currently rendered in this style. I would not expect them to be shown here in a general map. Recently somebody created a map that shows them, have a look here : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Babykarte |
In #3161 it was decided not not render playground equipment. |
@carstenhag are you only interested in Note that using different icons for each type of |
Well, to me it would make sense to at least show "something". I'm not sure if 20 icons on one playground are the best way. Nothing being shown just seems wrong. |
Normally a playground is tagged with See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:playground=structure - note: |
Well... https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/315040636 is the surrounding area with |
Sorry, I misinterpreted your comment about "it would make sense to at least show something". Do you have a thought about a way that these features could be shown, besides using different icons for each type? |
While leisure=playground is indeed a useful combination for the surroundings of a device in most cases, in reality you have sometimes stray devices e.g. in a park, without defining a playground. A swing here, a springy there. |
In my tagging, and also in my experience such places can be treated and mapped as a very small playgrounds. Is it something that is considered as poor tagging/incorrect? If yes - is it documented/discussed somewhere? |
I would not consider that a suitable solution. If I ask a query tool, how many playgrounds are in this area, the number would be significantly inflated by such 'micro-playgrounds'. Further, they have not a verifiable boundary. This probably needs further discussion and documentation. |
In that case mapping as a node is a good solution. |
I think we should probably close this issue, since #3161 attempted to render playground equipment but it was not possible to find 14 pixel icons that could work for all the features or a generic playground icon that did not look like a see-saw. However, if someone has new ideas about how to render these features in an appropriate way, we could reconsider. |
Happy enough to close, it is a case for a specialized map. |
Expected behavior
Structures get rendered. They should not be transparent.
Actual behavior
"Structure" playgrounds don't get rendered :(
Links and screenshots illustrating the problem
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/721297178
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/721297179
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: