Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

building with leisure=stadium has a weird border #1140

Closed
matkoniecz opened this issue Nov 26, 2014 · 6 comments
Closed

building with leisure=stadium has a weird border #1140

matkoniecz opened this issue Nov 26, 2014 · 6 comments

Comments

@matkoniecz
Copy link
Contributor

@daganzdaanda
Copy link

I think it's the stadium-green showing through. The old grey comes from a mixture of the green and the building's reddish grey with some transparency.

@daganzdaanda
Copy link

Possible solutions:
1a) don't render leisure=* on buildings, and treat all building=* the same
1b) don't render leisure=* on buildings, but treat building=stadium different
2) don't render building=* if there is leisure=*. Probably a bad idea.

@matkoniecz
Copy link
Contributor Author

or
3) treat building=* with leisure=stadium different, but it would fail in cases like http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/130575966 http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2274125

@daganzdaanda
Copy link

(sorry for the duplicate, I did not find this again... probably was searching for "sports_centre")
I'd favour 1b) which is also proposed in #1205.
Some tagging schemes may then look bad but these can be corrected quickly.
And then we can ignore leisure=stadium and leisure=sports_centre on buildings, apart from the names, which may need another look.

@kocio-pl
Copy link
Collaborator

Just a short check: the example object looks correct now, does it mean this issue is now solved?

@pnorman
Copy link
Collaborator

pnorman commented Sep 29, 2016

Solved.

@pnorman pnorman closed this as completed Sep 29, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants