-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 52
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(ast): add support for LambdaExpr to infer type from return expr type #1011
Merged
Merged
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
1d0a373
infer type from return expr, which would enable assignment to an appr…
zhumin8 24f05f6
add test.
zhumin8 1de792f
removed as already defined in Expr interface.
zhumin8 5f360a7
revert removal of type() override.
zhumin8 6a898d5
instead of modifying type in builder, set directly to concrete method…
zhumin8 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
keeping this despite sonar complains about already defined in
Expr
interface. It's seems the recommend way for @autovalue as explained in this doc. Also keeps consistent with other expression classes likeValueExpr
,CastExpr
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You might already considered it, can we just implement the
type()
method to return the type ofReturnExpr
, likereturn returnExpr().expr().type()
? So that we don't have to change any of the code in the builder.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
hmm, I actually did not think of that. Sounds like a better idea with less changes to existing code. The only thing is we won't be able to set a default value for
type()
, but that should be fine becauseReturnExpr().expr()
should always havetype
associated.Let me make the changes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If you want, we can still expose the
setType()
method and set a default value in thebuilder()
method, but like you saidReturnExpr().expr()
should always havetype
associated so we should never callsetType()
explicitly.