Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DNS over TCP #386

Closed
wants to merge 17 commits into from
Closed

DNS over TCP #386

wants to merge 17 commits into from

Conversation

McStork
Copy link
Contributor

@McStork McStork commented Nov 19, 2015

EARLY REVIEW please

Hi !
This is an attempt at implementing TCP, EDNS, DNSSEC.
For now my code only contains the TCP implementation for the DNS protocol. Once it's done, EDNS and DNSSEC should follow using the miekg/dns library (see #345 ).

I wrote some unit tests but failed at even running the already existing integration tests. I wish someone could help me with that:

. env/bin/activate
nosetests test_0025_mongodb_basic.py:Test.test_write_errors
E
======================================================================
ERROR: Should set status=Error on a bulk write that returns errors.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/root/workspace/src/github.com/elastic/packetbeat/tests/system/test_0025_mongodb_basic.py", line 197, in test_write_errors
    debug_selectors=["mongodb"])
  File "/root/workspace/src/github.com/elastic/packetbeat/tests/system/pbtests/packetbeat.py", line 84, in run_packetbeat
    stderr=subprocess.STDOUT)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/subprocess.py", line 679, in __init__
    errread, errwrite)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/subprocess.py", line 1259, in _execute_child
    raise child_exception
OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory

Any feedback on the code is welcomed. Thanks.
I also could use some help in order to know how to implement messageParser() and GapInStream(). Should the checks only rely on the decoder ? That's how it's managed for now.

root and others added 13 commits October 25, 2015 13:42
TODO: Check DNS message validity using the offset variable
Do basic tests
parse function almost over
TODO : testing parse func
TODO: Tests must validate and help complete dns.go
TODO: Need to add new tests with multiple packets TCP stream
TODO: The test raise an error, correct it
TODO: integration test
TODO: Integration test
@McStork
Copy link
Contributor Author

McStork commented Nov 19, 2015

Can the commit failures be repaired ?

@tsg
Copy link
Contributor

tsg commented Nov 19, 2015

@McStork this looks really promising!

Regarding the integration tests, I think the reason is that the "test" binary is not there. We use a special binary for the tests so we can get line coverage reports.

You have two options to create it:

  • make packetbeat.test in the top folder of the repo. Note that you'll have to do this explicitly after doing code changes in Packetbeat.
  • Simply run all tests once: make testsuite. This should create that binary for you as well as confirm that existing tests are ok. I just tried this in your branch and it ran fine.

@ruflin
Copy link
Member

ruflin commented Nov 20, 2015

@McStork no worries about all the commits. You can rebase and squash at the end.

@andrewkroh
Copy link
Member

@McStork It would make reviewing easier if you do the conversion to use miekg/dns in a separate pull request. So when you are ready, we will review this PR and get it merged in and you can open a second PR for the other changes. I briefly looked over this PR and it looks good.

@tsg
Copy link
Contributor

tsg commented Nov 30, 2015

@McStork I was wondering about the state of this PR, because we're planning to do a Github repos reorganization this week. We're merging all the official beats in a single repo. They way we do it is that we'll move the code from the other repos into this one, so this PR will still live.

However, because all Packetbeat files will be moved under a packetbeat/ folder, I expect it to result in a lot of merge/rebase conflicts. What do you think, is there any chance we could bring this to a mergeable state quickly and improve on it with future PRs? If not, I'm happy to also help with the rebase work after we do the repos reorg.

@McStork
Copy link
Contributor Author

McStork commented Dec 1, 2015

@tsg Well, I don't think I will be able to work on this PR this week. Right now Packetbeat is not top priority on my TODO list (but it will be), as I have a deadline coming very soon on another project.

What is left is debuging the TCP decode: the integration test doesn't decode the DNS over TCP packets, as if gopacket doesn't support it. That's what is left to do on this PR. But I can't guarantee you that I will be able to look into it this week :(.

@tsg
Copy link
Contributor

tsg commented Dec 1, 2015

Thanks for the quick reply. We'll then proceed to do the repositories reorganization and afterwards I'll try to spend some time helping with the review and the rebase to master. In any case, I'd really like to see this through :-)

@tsg tsg added the Packetbeat label Dec 7, 2015
Comment all the TCP unit tests that need proper []byte for request and
response but fail to decode it for now...
@McStork
Copy link
Contributor Author

McStork commented Dec 8, 2015

Could solve the issue ... in order to decode the payload of DNS TCP packets, it is needed to skip the first two bytes. So basically there is an offset of 2: decodeDNS(payload[2:]). If you guys know why, please let me know.

The integration test is validated and the live capture seems to work.
However I tried to use packets generated with gopacket/layers/testcreator.py for the unit tests, but gopacket fails to decode them (with or without the offset). So all TCP unit tests are commented until I can identify why the generated packets aren't decoded by gopacket.

@tsg
Copy link
Contributor

tsg commented Dec 8, 2015

Tests are failing on Travis & Appveyor due to the repo changes we did, you can ignore those until we do the rebase to master.

No idea about the 2 bytes, sorry, but looks like you're making great progress.

@elasticsearch-release
Copy link

Jenkins standing by to test this. If you aren't a maintainer, you can ignore this comment. Someone with commit access, please review this and clear it for Jenkins to run; then say 'jenkins, test it'.

@andrewkroh
Copy link
Member

@McStork The gopacket/layers/testcreator.py script generates byte arrays that contain everything from the Ethernet layer up. If you didn't account for this, then gopacket will probably fail to parse the data.

@McStork
Copy link
Contributor Author

McStork commented Dec 8, 2015

@andrewkroh Yup. Thanks, I saw the (yours?) comment at the top of the dns test file.
Every test validate now.

@McStork McStork changed the title DNS over TCP / EDNS / DNSSEC DNS over TCP Dec 8, 2015
@andrewkroh
Copy link
Member

@McStork Great to hear you fixed the tests. Can you rebase the PR on master and squash the commits?

@McStork
Copy link
Contributor Author

McStork commented Dec 8, 2015

How is that ? :/ I'm new to git, plus with the recent changes in this repo, I'm not sure if I ran the good command lines.... but somehow I doubt it.

@andrewkroh
Copy link
Member

It looks like something went wrong with your rebase. I took the liberty of attempting the rebase for you. If you would like, you can do this to pull down my rebased version of your changes and test them to make sure things still work.

git checkout -b dns-tcp-rebase
git pull https://github.com/andrewkroh/beats.git mcstork-dns-tcp-rebase
git push

From there, the simplest thing to do would be open a new PR and we will just close this one. Another option would be to force push the dns-tcp-rebase branch to your dns branch which would update this PR.

@McStork
Copy link
Contributor Author

McStork commented Dec 9, 2015

I will try to open a new PR then.
Out of curiosity and to get more skilled at git, could you give me the commands you ran for the rebase ?

To use your rebase, I ran those:

git checkout -b dns-tcp-rebase
git pull https://github.com/andrewkroh/beats.git mcstork-dns-tcp-rebase
git push -f origin dns-tcp-rebase

Will the PR be ok with this forced push ? :/

If I don't force with -f and do just git push origin dns-tcp-rebase, I get:

To https://github.com/McStork/packetbeat.git
 ! [rejected]        dns-tcp-rebase -> dns-tcp-rebase (non-fast-forward)
error: failed to push some refs to 'https://github.com/McStork/packetbeat.git'
hint: Updates were rejected because the tip of your current branch is behind
hint: its remote counterpart. Merge the remote changes (e.g. 'git pull')
hint: before pushing again.
hint: See the 'Note about fast-forwards' in 'git push --help' for details.

@McStork McStork mentioned this pull request Dec 9, 2015
@andrewkroh andrewkroh closed this Dec 9, 2015
@andrewkroh
Copy link
Member

Well the rebase was slightly more complex because I was rebasing on your behalf. But normally you do this (there are many ways to accomplish this task):

# Get latest from elastic master
git checkout master
git pull

# Rebase master into your feature branch
git checkout feature/my-feature
git rebase master

# You have to force push because you are re-writing the remote's history
git push -f

@McStork
Copy link
Contributor Author

McStork commented Dec 9, 2015

@andrewkroh Thanks !

@McStork McStork deleted the dns branch December 16, 2015 21:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants