Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update default plugin brokers to v0.20 - support relative paths #14329

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 27, 2019

Conversation

amisevsk
Copy link
Contributor

What does this PR do?

Update default version of brokers to v0.20 to correspond with latest release

What issues does this PR fix or reference?

#14163

Release Notes

N/A for now

Docs PR

Not ready for docs yet, since there's no established flow for relative path extension artifacts.

Signed-off-by: Angel Misevski <amisevsk@redhat.com>
@amisevsk amisevsk added the kind/enhancement A feature request - must adhere to the feature request template. label Aug 23, 2019
@che-bot che-bot added the status/code-review This issue has a pull request posted for it and is awaiting code review completion by the community. label Aug 23, 2019
@che-bot
Copy link
Contributor

che-bot commented Aug 23, 2019

E2E Happy path tests of Eclipse Che Single User on K8S (minikube v1.1.1) has been successful:

  • build details
  • "che-server" docker image: maxura/che-server:14329

@che-bot
Copy link
Contributor

che-bot commented Aug 23, 2019

E2E tests of Eclipse Che Multiuser on OCP has failed:

@amisevsk
Copy link
Contributor Author

ci-test

@che-bot
Copy link
Contributor

che-bot commented Aug 26, 2019

E2E tests of Eclipse Che Multiuser on OCP has been successful:

@amisevsk
Copy link
Contributor Author

ci-build

@amisevsk amisevsk merged commit ad331b1 into eclipse-che:master Aug 27, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/enhancement A feature request - must adhere to the feature request template. status/code-review This issue has a pull request posted for it and is awaiting code review completion by the community.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants