Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

extended deforum notation as DSL #97

Open
dmarx opened this issue Jun 16, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

extended deforum notation as DSL #97

dmarx opened this issue Jun 16, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@dmarx
Copy link
Owner

dmarx commented Jun 16, 2023

https://discord.com/channels/1010951174146510939/1063895338345304064/1119320634200182804

maybe I should just extend the notation deforum is using to add additional optional arguments. so like <t>:(<value>)(<interpolator>) or something like that. maybe change the paren to brackets for the new bit to make it clearer that it's a different thing for the user <t>:(<value>){<interpolator>}

@dmarx
Copy link
Owner Author

dmarx commented Jun 16, 2023

maybe not brackets for the sake of more readable f-strings/parsers. also, that interpolator spot could potentially be used for multiple arguments. maybe I could use that to specify bounce, loop...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant