Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: correct documentation for BaseInteraction#inCachedGuild #10456

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 22, 2024

Conversation

Wolvinny
Copy link
Contributor

inCachedGuild typeguard had incorrect wording

Please describe the changes this PR makes and why it should be merged:

The wording on the inCachedGuild typeguard is incorrect

Status and versioning classification:

  • This PR only includes non-code changes, like changes to documentation, README, etc.

inCachedGuild typeguard had incorrect wording
@Wolvinny Wolvinny requested a review from a team as a code owner August 22, 2024 12:44
Copy link

vercel bot commented Aug 22, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

2 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
discord-js ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Aug 22, 2024 1:01pm
discord-js-guide ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Aug 22, 2024 1:01pm

@vladfrangu vladfrangu changed the title Update BaseInteraction.js docs: correct documentation for BaseInteraction#inCachedGuild Aug 22, 2024
@almeidx almeidx added this to the discord.js 14.16 milestone Aug 22, 2024
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit bddf018 into discordjs:main Aug 22, 2024
7 checks passed
@Wolvinny Wolvinny deleted the wolvinny branch August 22, 2024 13:09
nyapat pushed a commit to nyapat/discord.js that referenced this pull request Sep 9, 2024
…djs#10456)

* Update BaseInteraction.js

inCachedGuild typeguard had incorrect wording

* docs: wording

---------

Co-authored-by: Almeida <github@almeidx.dev>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants