Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add compatibility endpoint for exporting multiple images #7966

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 8, 2020

Conversation

baude
Copy link
Member

@baude baude commented Oct 8, 2020

with the recent inclusion of dealing with multiple images in a tar archive, we can now add a compatibility endpoint that was missing images/get?names=one,two.

Fixes: #7950

Signed-off-by: baude bbaude@redhat.com

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: baude

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 8, 2020
Copy link
Member

@vrothberg vrothberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code LGTM

It would be nice to get a test for that in the apiv2 tests.

@baude
Copy link
Member Author

baude commented Oct 8, 2020

yeah, we need them wired up, they are missing rn

pkg/api/handlers/compat/images.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
utils.Error(w, "Something went wrong.", http.StatusInternalServerError, errors.Wrap(err, "unable to close tempfile"))
return
}
if err := runtime.ImageRuntime().SaveImages(r.Context(), images, "docker-archive", tmpfile.Name(), false); err != nil {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I do not see where in SaveImages() the repositories file is created.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i personally see that as out of scope. i would like to treat it as a bug when "we" hit it. cool with that?

with the recent inclusion of dealing with multiple images in a tar archive, we can now add a compatibility endpoint that was missing images/get?names=one,two.

Fixes: containers#7950

Signed-off-by: baude <bbaude@redhat.com>
@baude
Copy link
Member Author

baude commented Oct 8, 2020

test now added

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Oct 8, 2020

/lgtm
/hold

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Oct 8, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 8, 2020
@jwhonce
Copy link
Member

jwhonce commented Oct 8, 2020

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Oct 8, 2020
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 2a63795 into containers:master Oct 8, 2020
@baude baude deleted the issue7950 branch May 18, 2022 15:19
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 21, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 21, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

REST API Method Not Allowed with Podman 2.0.5 and Grype
6 participants