Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

build a recipe(metapackage) instead of an installer? #10

Closed
hhuuggoo opened this issue Mar 14, 2016 · 4 comments
Closed

build a recipe(metapackage) instead of an installer? #10

hhuuggoo opened this issue Mar 14, 2016 · 4 comments
Labels
locked [bot] locked due to inactivity

Comments

@hhuuggoo
Copy link

there are many cases where metapackages are better than installers, is there a way to build a metapackage with conda constructor?

@bkreider
Copy link

I don't think so. A metapackage is just a conda package with an empty payload -- just requirements, not actual files. Constructor builds a binary package of all of your requirements (conda packages).

@ilanschnell
Copy link
Contributor

With conda/conda-build#741 being merged, it is quite easy to use conda-build to create a meta package. Just create a recipe (with no source), and specify what you need in your runtime dependencies, and all dependencies will get put into the (meta) conda package you build.

@hhuuggoo
Copy link
Author

@ilanschnell that PR looks awesome! thanks!

@github-actions
Copy link

Hi there, thank you for your contribution!

This issue has been automatically locked because it has not had recent activity after being closed.

Please open a new issue if needed.

Thanks!

@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked [bot] locked due to inactivity label Mar 14, 2022
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 14, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
locked [bot] locked due to inactivity
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants