From 8b586fc6212c9ad50ef1eee44151dc138d2af8ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ricardo Serrano Gutierrez <145554214+TEF-RicardoSerr@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 18:41:53 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Create API-Scope-Enhancement Template.md --- documentation/API-Scope-Enhancement Template.md | 17 +++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+) create mode 100644 documentation/API-Scope-Enhancement Template.md diff --git a/documentation/API-Scope-Enhancement Template.md b/documentation/API-Scope-Enhancement Template.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6bc1078 --- /dev/null +++ b/documentation/API-Scope-Enhancement Template.md @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +# API Scope Enhancement Template +This template captures all the information that a partner should fill out when proposing a scope enhancement for an existing CAMARA API + + +| **Field** | Description | +| ---- | ----- | +| API name | [Name of the API or API family whose scope is proposed to be enhanced](url) | +| New API name | New API name proposed to encompass the new scope (if applies) | +| Scope Enhancement owner | Company submitting the API enhancement. | +| Scope Enhancement summary | High level description / scope of the API or API family, and two/three examples of in-scope business cases. | +| Technical viability | Identify the underlying network/cloud capabilities which are needed for the support of this API or API family, relating these capabilities them to standards maturity.
Example: this API requires the availability of NEF with this Rel-15 "X"feature. +| Commercial viability | Specify the availability of commercial or (industrialized) open-source solutions for the identified network/cloud capabilities.
NOTE: If open-source, provide a publicly available reference/link to the actual solution, and specify the version under consideration.| +| YAML code available? | YES / NO. | +| Validated in lab/productive environments? | YES / NO.
If YES, specify if it was lab network or productive network. | +| Validated with real customers? | YES / NO.
If YES, specify how many customers participated in the evaluation, and what their use cases were.
NOTE: It is not mandatory (though recommendable) to specify the name of the customers. | +| Validated with operators? | YES / NO.
If YES, specify how many operators participated in the evaluation.
NOTE: It is not mandatory (though recommendable) to specify the name of the operators. | +| Supporters in API Backlog Working Group | List of supporters.
NOTE: That shall be added by the Working Group. |