Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fooling success rate is zero #1

Open
kgramm9026 opened this issue May 18, 2018 · 3 comments
Open

Fooling success rate is zero #1

kgramm9026 opened this issue May 18, 2018 · 3 comments

Comments

@kgramm9026
Copy link

Hi Guys, When I run the script (run_demo) with the model file generated from the run_training, I get

Model accuracy on adversarial examples: 0.6645
Fooling success rate: 0.0
Most of the adversarial examples generated are exactly similar to the original examples.I haven't changed any of the default flags in the run_demo script. Please let me know if I am doing something incorrectly.

@minfeixia
Copy link

Hi Guys, When I run the script (run_demo) with the model file generated from the run_training, I get

Model accuracy on adversarial examples: 0.6645
Fooling success rate: 0.0
Most of the adversarial examples generated are exactly similar to the original examples.I haven't changed any of the default flags in the run_demo script. Please let me know if I am doing something incorrectly.

I have the same problem with you. Can you solve it now?

@kgramm9026
Copy link
Author

@minfeixia I haven't had any success after

@bogdan-kulynych
Copy link
Owner

Folks, thanks for your interest. It seems that a bunch of dependencies (specifically, I suspect spacy is one of the culprits) have broken some of the code in this repo. I am not sure, but perhaps running on an older version of Ubuntu might help.

We are currently working on a better, extended, and a more generic version of the textfool's framework. Since I have very limited resources time-wise now, I would rather spend them on the new improved version, which should be out soon-ish.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants