-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
b.println() should allow multiple parameters #216
Comments
At the moment I would vote to have both ... to have maximum compatibility with p5 and processing. |
Me to. Also |
Ok. Not sure, if I've ever seen someone use Then we should just allow for multiple parameters. |
Also vote for definitely keeping b.println() – b.print() doesn't hurt to have a version that doesn't auto add the new line.. but also never use it myself, since println is soo useful! |
+1 on the multiple parameters. :-) |
Implemented via #235. |
b.println()
should allow for more than one parameter. At the moment, it just prints the first parameter to console.Also, and this is a question, not a suggestion: p5.js replaced
println()
by justprint()
(and therefore removed a dedicatedprint()
method). Processing still has both. Would it make any sense to replace theb.println()
command byb.print()
for easier typing?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: