We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hi again, I've seen in an older issue that you were planning on gathering cited papers and not only cited-by papers (#3). Is this still in plan?
From what I understood the main concern at the time was the lack of source to get this information. But it seems that in the mean time crossref has added this field (for some of their papers), otherwise scopus API also has it (https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/106790/api-to-get-citations-from-doi).
Cheers,
Seb
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
That's good news! Besides retrieving citees, it opens the way for siblings scrapping (citers' citees, citees' citers, and so on with arbitrary depth).
A bit of code refactoring is required to integrate the feature, though.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Hi again,
I've seen in an older issue that you were planning on gathering cited papers and not only cited-by papers (#3). Is this still in plan?
From what I understood the main concern at the time was the lack of source to get this information. But it seems that in the mean time crossref has added this field (for some of their papers), otherwise scopus API also has it (https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/106790/api-to-get-citations-from-doi).
Cheers,
Seb
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: