Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bird view gives mAP=0 #6

Open
Ben93kie opened this issue Jul 9, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

Bird view gives mAP=0 #6

Ben93kie opened this issue Jul 9, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@Ben93kie
Copy link

Ben93kie commented Jul 9, 2020

Thank you for providing your implementations. After getting this repo to run a few error occured.
Both the pretrained baseline model faster_rcnn_1_10_3960.pth and a model I trained on UAVDT yields mAP=0 for bird view. The overall mAP also is wrong (for almost all the categories). Could you shortly tell me, how I have to set

self._angles,
self._altitudes,
self._weathers

and

self._weather_to_ind,
self._altitude_to_ind,
self._angle_to_ind

as there are different version that are commented out. If I just take the uncommented rows it yields an key error. (f.ex. should I choose them as so: self._angle_to_ind = {'front-side-view': 0, 'front-view': 1, 'side-view': 0, 'bird-view': 2} ?)

Furthermore, you said that you were gonna "discard the foggy class". Does that mean you don't train and test on images labeled as foggy? If I include the foggy class and assign it to "day", the mAP is considerably worse.
Thank you!

@wuzhenyusjtu
Copy link
Collaborator

wuzhenyusjtu commented Jul 27, 2020

Hi Ben, I think your evaluation is wrong. Before you quantitively evaluate the model, you can run a qualitative evaluation on the testing images by visualizing the bounding boxes.
Also, we didn't discard the foggy videos. We relabel them as day or night.

@Ben93kie
Copy link
Author

Thank you very much for your reply. I managed to get it working.
Just a few follow-up question if you don't mind:
-did you use the original image size (i.e. 1024 x 520) or did you use the configuration large_scale (effectively upscaling the image to aprox. 1300x800)? And is there a change in configuration for training and testing, respectively?
-did you use any data augmentation (such as horizontally flipping)?

Thank you for your help!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants