Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor RenameFields to Rename with appropirate deprecation process #1123

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Aug 20, 2024

Conversation

elronbandel
Copy link
Member

Signed-off-by: elronbandel elron.bandel@ibm.com

Signed-off-by: elronbandel <elron.bandel@ibm.com>
Copy link
Member

@yoavkatz yoavkatz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

See #1125 . I think it should be simplified more . The field_to_field is really a complex syntax and not the same as other operators.

elronbandel and others added 5 commits August 8, 2024 16:54
Signed-off-by: elronbandel <elron.bandel@ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: elronbandel <elronbandel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: elronbandel <elronbandel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: elronbandel <elronbandel@gmail.com>
@elronbandel elronbandel merged commit 8c9b1df into main Aug 20, 2024
8 checks passed
@elronbandel elronbandel deleted the rename-renaming-operator branch August 20, 2024 14:00
csrajmohan pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 29, 2024
…1123)

* Refactor RenameFields to Rename with appropirate deprecation process

Signed-off-by: elronbandel <elron.bandel@ibm.com>

* Fixes

Signed-off-by: elronbandel <elron.bandel@ibm.com>

* Fix

Signed-off-by: elronbandel <elronbandel@gmail.com>

* FIx

Signed-off-by: elronbandel <elronbandel@gmail.com>

---------

Signed-off-by: elronbandel <elron.bandel@ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: elronbandel <elronbandel@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants