[Bug Report] spaces.Box ValueError: Some low values are greater than high

[elliottower]

Describe the bug

Found when testing python 3.11 with other farama projects (supersuit in this case), but just tested with a new venv and gymnasium v29 and python3.11 and nothing else

https://github.com/Farama-Foundation/SuperSuit/actions/runs/5583348225/jobs/10203570526

Code example

from gymnasium import spaces
import numpy as np
spaces.Box(low=0, high=255, shape=[64, 64, 3], dtype=np.int8)

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/elliot/.pycharm_helpers/pydev/_pydevd_bundle/pydevd_exec2.py", line 3, in Exec
    exec(exp, global_vars, local_vars)
  File "<input>", line 1, in <module>
  File "/home/elliot/anaconda3/envs/shimmy/lib/python3.11/site-packages/gymnasium/spaces/box.py", line 126, in __init__
    raise ValueError(
ValueError: Some low values are greater than high, low=[[[0 0 0]
  [0 0 0]
  [0 0 0]
  ...
  [0 0 0]
  [0 0 0]
  [0 0 0]]
 [[0 0 0]
  [0 0 0]
  [0 0 0]
  ...
  [0 0 0]
  [0 0 0]
  [0 0 0]]
 [[0 0 0]
  [0 0 0]
  [0 0 0]
  ...
  [0 0 0]
  [0 0 0]
  [0 0 0]]
 ...
 [[0 0 0]
  [0 0 0]
  [0 0 0]
  ...
  [0 0 0]
  [0 0 0]
  [0 0 0]]
 [[0 0 0]
  [0 0 0]
  [0 0 0]
  ...
  [0 0 0]
  [0 0 0]
  [0 0 0]]
 [[0 0 0]
  [0 0 0]
  [0 0 0]
  ...
  [0 0 0]
  [0 0 0]
  [0 0 0]]], high=[[[-1 -1 -1]
  [-1 -1 -1]
  [-1 -1 -1]
  ...
  [-1 -1 -1]
  [-1 -1 -1]
  [-1 -1 -1]]
 [[-1 -1 -1]
  [-1 -1 -1]
  [-1 -1 -1]
  ...
  [-1 -1 -1]
  [-1 -1 -1]
  [-1 -1 -1]]
 [[-1 -1 -1]
  [-1 -1 -1]
  [-1 -1 -1]
  ...
  [-1 -1 -1]
  [-1 -1 -1]
  [-1 -1 -1]]
 ...
 [[-1 -1 -1]
  [-1 -1 -1]
  [-1 -1 -1]
  ...
  [-1 -1 -1]
  [-1 -1 -1]
  [-1 -1 -1]]
 [[-1 -1 -1]
  [-1 -1 -1]
  [-1 -1 -1]
  ...
  [-1 -1 -1]
  [-1 -1 -1]
  [-1 -1 -1]]
 [[-1 -1 -1]
  [-1 -1 -1]
  [-1 -1 -1]
  ...
  [-1 -1 -1]
  [-1 -1 -1]
  [-1 -1 -1]]]

### System info

_No response_

### Additional context

_No response_

### Checklist

- [X] I have checked that there is no similar [issue](https://github.com/Farama-Foundation/Gymnasium/issues) in the repo

[elliottower]

Oh it looks like this is just a poorly designed SuperSuit test cause they use np.int8 when it's a number larger than +-128. Testing different versions of Python it appears 3.10 has the same error, so I think it's just a new error that was added with V29 that may affect some backwards compatibility (which to be fair, you don't want to accidentally have your low values be larger than high values so it's a useful error)

[pseudo-rnd-thoughts]

@elliottower I suspect it is meant to be uint8 as this would be a valid bound

[elliottower]

@elliottower I suspect it is meant to be uint8 as this would be a valid bound

Ya makes sense just not int8